Date : March 11th, 2010Category : UncategorizedAuthor :
IT was not just the prying eyes of the gossip hounds that remained fixed on a penthouse apartment in Bondi Beach last night, while Michael Clarke, the cricketer anointed the next captain of Australia, tried to resolve his future with a rather flaky swimwear model by the name of Lara Bingle.
The reality of the Pup’n'Bingle soap opera is that the group of men charged by Cricket Australia with choosing the national cricket team – and appointing its leaders – were every bit as fixated as the rest of the nation.
Like Tiger Woods taking an indefinite break from golf after his infidelities were revealed, when Clarke abandoned the tour of New Zealand mid-series to be with a partner still paying for her own indiscretions, he confirmed that he could no longer quarantine his chaotic personal life from the field of play. The relationship was threatening to derail both the performance of a key batsman at the crease and the vice-captain’s leadership in the dressing room.
For cricket commentators, past players and relationship experts, this is a situation that cannot last.
Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.
It is likely that by this morning, behind the tinted windows of Clarke’s $6 million apartment, a decision will have been made: the engagement will soldier on, or “Clarkey” will have asked for his keys back. Last night, the first reports of a breakup were surfacing on the TV news, and were denied by Clarke’s manager Chris White.
Ian Chappell is one of several former cricketing greats to have expressed concern at Clarke’s future as Test leader, despite the fact that the 28-year-old has long been considered the heir apparent to present captain Ricky Ponting.
“I understand that situations can come along where things need to be sorted out domestically but if I was a selector, it would be in the back of my mind. I’d be thinking, ‘Well, if we have another candidate the equal to this Michael Clarke, he might be worth looking at’,” says Chappell, who captained the Australian side in the 1970s.
“Stability and durability, to me, are very important factors in an Australian captain. they might not be right at the top of the list but they’re right up there.”
And at the moment they are qualities that could hardly be used to describe the life of a celebrity couple whose arguments and appearances are documented by the nation’s media. just last night Bingle’s failure to wear her engagement ring was reported on the TV news.
And according to psychologists, if such chaos continues the gifted cricketer may not be able to claim stability and durability in his on-field performances either.
“In my view, off-field and personal issues are quite critical to the probability of an athlete achieving success on the field,” says Jeff Bond, a leading sports psychologist who worked with the Australian Institute of Sport and more recently the Richmond AFL club.
“Not many athletes can divorce personal problems from their performance. It’s not as easy as switching channels.”
Bond cites three ways in which dramas such as Bingle’s nude photo scandal might undermine sportsmen or sportswomen on game day.
Firstly, people have a finite capacity to absorb and cope with stress, Bond says.
As a result, off-field dramas add to an athlete’s baseload of stress, meaning he or she has limited tolerance to cope with the additional pressure that will inevitably come during competition.
Secondly, research has shown there is a strong correlation between mood states and performance, so a low mood often leads to poorer results. and such personal issues also impede on an athlete’s concentration.
So while “thought-stopping” techniques can be taught so that athletes “park” their personal issues, those issues will inevitably take a toll, Bond says.
Relationships expert Anne Hollonds agrees. A psychologist with Relationships Australia, Hollonds notes that while celebrities have to deal with the added hassle of the media spotlight when their relationships are strained, all couples – famous or otherwise – face the same fundamental issues.
“I think it’s a myth that you can separate your personal life from your professional life, because they clearly impact on each other and I think that is widely understood these days,” she says.
While not wanting to comment on the Clarke-Bingle matter, Hollonds says people in the public eye “have the same problems as everyone else, when it comes to managing complex personal issues and demanding work lives”.
“It’s not easy for any of us, trying to juggle our personal and professional lives. and of course, for the likes of Tiger Woods, being photographed when coming out of rehab, it makes things harder.
“But we are all human. It’s not helpful to assume that we are robots who can ’switch on’ when we’re in our professional mode if things are not right in our personal lives. A lot depends on what kind of partnership you have in the first place . . . and the severity, degree and frequency of the problems. if you have a strong partnership, that helps in dealing with the ups and downs of life.”
Of course, as Bond notes, if it’s a big ask to expect an athlete to forget their issues and just focus on a game, there are also exceptions to this rule: exceptions such as
Clarke’s former teammate Shane Warne, whose unrivalled ability to spin a cricket ball from leg to off was matched only by his appetite for women other than his wife.
On the eve of the 2005 Ashes series in England, Warne’s marriage to Simone unravelled after British tabloids revealed at least two of his affairs, replete with details of his sexual performance (a “stallion”, apparently) and the location of some of the liaisons (the bonnet of his BMW).
But after announcing his separation in a press release, Warne went on to bag 40 wickets in the Test series. and it was a young Michael “Pup” Clarke whom the legspinner turned to during that northern summer for friendship and support.
But if the legend of Shane Keith Warne only grew, his captaincy prospects all but disappeared. Australia’s second-greatest cricketer after Don Bradman, and arguably our most astute cricket brain, Warne would never claim the (c) after his name in a Test.
While Cricket Australia never said as much, it was known that the sport’s powerbrokers ruled a line through the captaincy prospects of Warne as scandal after scandal engulfed the legspinner.
Put simply, the office of Australian Test captain has always demanded a certain personality type: forthright, dependable, and certainly not one who is likely to attract off-field headlines for the wrong reasons.
And this goes to the heart of Clarke’s professional problem.
His issues, as private as they are, are being played out in public.
So while the likes of teammate Mitchell Johnson can endure tabloid reports that his mother had declared she was no fan of his lads’ mag model and karate champ girlfriend Jessica Bratich, the media storm surrounding Clarke and Bingle is on another scale.
It is a storm that has been raging ever since the Sydney Test of January 2009, when it was revealed that teammate Simon Katich had grabbed Clarke by the throat at the end of the game. The batsman had asked Katich if the team song could be sung earlier than usual because he wanted to leave the clubrooms to be with Bingle.
The present imbroglio can actually be charted back even further, to 2006, when Bingle in her pre-Clarke days had an affair with a married AFL footballer, Brendan Fevola. It later emerged that Fevola had taken a photo of her naked on his phone, against her will, and then allegedly circulated the photo to friends.
In a paid interview with Woman’s Day magazine this week – the same publication that first published the photo – the 22-year-old model spoke of feeling “violated” by Fevola.
And a day later, amid the fall-out from her interview, she summoned her fiance home from the tour of New Zealand.
If Clarke can take any comfort from the experiences of others, it can perhaps be found in the travails of the present captain, Ricky Ponting.
Eleven years ago, Ponting, then a precocious talent but not yet a great, was involved in a drunken scuffle in Sydney’s Kings Cross that left him with a black eye, a bruised ego and a three-match ban from the limited-overs team. always touted as a future leader, he was suddenly tarnished and a promotion to the captaincy could scarcely have been imagined.
But rather than cruelling his chances of ever assuming the highest office in Australian sport, Ponting’s indiscretion actually marked the turning point in his life. He confessed to an alcohol problem, cleaned up his private life, and can now claimed to have won more Tests than any other captain in the game’s history.
The question now is whether Clarke can do the same; whether his love for Bingle outweighs the angst their relationship is causing him and the team.
It is clearly no easy decision, but his captain – if not the media – is giving him time to make it.
“I haven’t heard from him today and don’t really expect to,” Ponting said yesterday in New Zealand.
“He knows, from all of us within the team, that he has our support. The last thing I said to him before he left was just to take as much time as he needed.”
Warning bells for a future skipper
Tags : bondi beach, dressing room, indiscretions, prying eyes, soap opera, vice captain
Date : March 11th, 2010Category : UncategorizedAuthor :
Donald Trump has some advice for television executives looking to increase ratings.
His master plan? Give them more Trump.
“They need more shows like ‘The Apprentice,’ ” Trump said in a recent conference call with reporters. “Not necessarily from a reality show standpoint, but they need shows that hit, that capture the imagination.”
Trump’s “The Celebrity Apprentice” (launching its third season Sunday at 9 p.m. on WHDH, Ch. 7), sets VIPs – some more notable than others – against one another in challenges that end in those notorious boardroom eliminations, capped by Trump’s famous final words: “You’re fired.”
“Frankly, certain shows that are on should be changed,” Trump said with characteristic self-assurance. “They get some pretty good reviews, but they don’t get people watching. Ultimately, the people watching is going to be very important. and it’s nice to get both. We’ve sort of had both.”
Rocker Bret Michaels, disgraced former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich, singer Cyndi Lauper, ex-baseball player Darryl Strawberry, one-time pro wrestler Bill Goldberg and Sharon Osbourne are among those competing this season.
Trump said this group is the most stubborn of the three celebrity seasons.
“They’ve been very tough – very nasty. but there’s also a lot of fun and funniness with respect to what happens, which I don’t think we had in the last one with Joan (Rivers), as an example, and with Piers (Morgan, season one),” he said. “It was really nasty with people really hating each other. These people hate each other, but it’s also funny. There’s something funny about it that I didn’t have in the first two, so I think that might be the biggest differentiation in terms of the three casts.”
Goldberg, with his massive frame, intimidates some of the other players, Trump said.
“First of all, he’s very capable,” Trump said. “And he’s a very tough guy. He’s not easy to get along with, I can tell you. I just don’t mean tough physically. He’s tough in a lot of other ways. I have a lot of respect for him, but he’s a very difficult kind of guy.”
Michaels, best known now for sifting through scantily clad bachelorettes on his VH1 reality show “Rock of love,” found himself staring down the Goldberg barrel at times.
“He’s menacing to be around, first of all,” Michaels said. “He’s a very extremely, extremely intense guy. when he goes after something, he really goes after it. If you’re in his way, you get run down.”
Even the snarling Goldberg must eventually face Trump in the boardroom. when it comes to passing final judgment, the results can appear heartless. does it ever bother the CEO?
“No, not always,” Trump said. “Not everybody do I like. Sometimes I don’t like people. and you know, it doesn’t bother me. the hard ones are when you really like somebody, really respect somebody and they make a mistake.”
Donald Trump fired up about new ‘Celebrity Apprentice’
Tags : baseball player, boardroom, illinois governor, third season
Date : March 11th, 2010Category : UncategorizedAuthor :
NWO Trading Cards Track Stats of World Elite
JonesReport.com | may 13, 2008
While much of the general public is obsessed with their favorite sports stars and the latest gossip amongst celebrities, the power elite quietly carry out the agendas that really matter.
Now, NWO trading cards allow an emblematic shifting of the focus to what is really important. In the same style as childhood baseball cards, activists and John Q. Public alike can track the stats of the world’s true movers-and-shakers and trade information to wake up the masses.
Trade them with the as-yet unawakened individuals and open their eyes to what really happened on 9/11, who and what is the New World Order and who is leading the fight of resistance.
First edition cards include top neo-cons, freedom fighters like G. Edward Griffin and Alex Jones and many others.
http://www.nwotradingcards.com
CLICK ON THE BANNER TO BUY TERRORSTORM IN
“HARD COPY
NWO Trading Cards Track Stats of World Elite
Related Blogs
Tags : celebrities, freedom fighters, sports stars
Date : March 11th, 2010Category : UncategorizedAuthor :
 Did you know that a pagan winter festival was traditionally the most popular festival of the year in many cultures long before Jesus ever came to this earth?
Did you know that December 25th was celebrated as the “birthday” of pagan gods such as Mithras and Sol long before it became Christianized?
Did you know that Jesus WAS NOT born on December 25th?
One of the pagan pre-Christian festivals was called Saturnalia.
It was a holiday when the Romans commemorated the dedication of the temple of their god Saturn, which was on the 17th of December and the festival would last for a whole week until the 23rd of December.
Later the Romans also started holding a festival on December 25 called Dies Natalis Solis Invicti, which means “the birthday of the undefeated sun.”
Pagan Scandinavia also celebrated a winter festival called Yule, which was held from late December to early January. Yule logs were lit to honor the god “Thor”. The holiday would continue until the Yule log burned out, which could take as many as twelve days. Thus this is where we get the “12 days of Christmas”.
In the year 350 A.D., Pope Julius I declared that “Christ’s birth” would be celebrated on December 25th from then on.
His rationale was that he was trying to make it easier for pagan Romans to convert to Christianity.
But Jesus was not born on December 25th.
It would have been way too cold for shepherds to be out with their sheep at night during that time.
Jesus was actually born during the Feast of Tabernacles.
Are you ready for more stuff you didn’t know about Christmas?
Watch this video:
Christmas Was Not Originally A Christian Holiday
Related Blogs
Tags : christian festivals, saturn
Date : March 10th, 2010Category : UncategorizedAuthor :
Feature Article of Wednesday, 10 March 2010
Columnist: Bonsu, Akua
the formula for chaos is the same. Oil is discovered in a country that has, until then, been struggling to find its economic identity. a foreign company comes in pretending to have the country’s utmost interest at heart. Usually, if that company is genuine, it comes in to do business and minds its own business. It is the crooked ones that try to point a finger at other foreign companies in the same vicinity and other local factions so as to deflect scrutiny. by so doing, these companies pitch local interests against one another. the local interests begin to fight amongst themselves. And as they focus on one another, the greedy company quietly makes money while playing buddies with the warring local interests behind the scenes. in Ghana today, no company is playing that game as masterfully as Anadarko.
the Houston based company came to Ghana in 2006, two years after Kosmos and EO had signed a Petroleum Agreement with GNPC. Kosmos had employed its innovative technology to acquire 3D Siesmic data and needed a drilling rig to drill their prospects. Partly due to scarcity of deepwater drilling rig during the 2007 euphoric period when oil price was matching up to $200/bbl, Kosmos invited Anadarko who at the time had a drilling rig available to be used to partner with them. the move is also a standard industry practice to spread risk. Although Anadarko was initially reluctant, it was impressed by Kosmos’ record of oil discoveries in previously unknown fields. It wasn’t until Kosmos agreed to split its portion evenly with Anadarko that the latter agreed to sign onto the deal.
As evidence of Anadarko’s initial reluctance, not only did its officials not begin their customary due diligence before signing the agreement as mandated by United States laws, they even declined an offer by GNPC to make them the operating partner. in fact, Anadarko wanted drilling to be delayed for 5 years because of its commitment and concentration on other projects around the world, but Kosmos, having only its Ghana operation, and the government not interested in delays in potential oil finds, overruled Anadarko. furthermore, during the time Kosmos was drilling the first Mahogany well some members of Anadarko technical team were overheard during a Golden Tulip lunch expressing their dismay over senior executive’s decision to come to Ghana. So pessimistic was Anadarko that it met the Government and Kosmos’ announcement of oil find with denial, and like the NDC, publicly ridiculed the government for presumably throwing dust into the eyes of Ghanaians. When the Mahogany- 1 discovery became a reality, however, all hell broke loose.
Consistent with industry trend of major oil companies trying to squeeze out indigenous companies, Anadarko demonstrated an unquenchable greed without any morals, and begun its endless pursuit for the operatorship of the newly discovered field.one characteristic that is common among all oil companies which is the the first step was to team up with Tullow, another partner in the Jubilee field, to squeeze Kosmos and EO out. Tullow refused. Next, Anadarko tried to leverage nationalistic sentiments to join forces with Kosmos and EO to squeeze Britian’s Tullow out, but Kosmos returned Tullow’s favor and refused. Finding itself increasingly falling out of favor with its partners, Anadarko suddenly saw the need to do its due diligence on the two American companies involved in the partnership. the hope was to find an infringement of the United States Foreign Corrupt Practice Act (FCPC) by EO and Kosmos to use as leverage to force them to make Anadarko the operating Partner.
that last ditch effort was enhanced by the unexpected 2008 election results that brought in the NDC. It did not hurt Anadarko that it was the only foreign oil company that courted the NDC when it was in the opposition. It was an insurance move on the part of Anadarko to secretly court the opposition in the event that it comes to power because it was not getting its way with the NPP government.
Anadarko’s quest to find dirt on its partners involved 50 attorneys who looked through eight million documents including a million email messages, countless tax and bank records. the final report by its own hired attorneys indicated that although there were some “red flags, no smoking gun” could be found associated with Kosmos and EO’s dealing with Ghanaian officials.
meanwhile, some NDC officials have privately conceded that some officials are having “sleepless nights” over the possibility of EO coming into such huge amount of money. Thus the Anadarko investigation of Kosmos and EO was the perfect gift. use that investigation to make claims that the NPP government gave a sweetheart deal to Kosmos because members of the EO Group are “Kufuor’s Boys” – Ghanaians would buy that. So far it may be working. like fish on a hook, Ghanaians, especially sympathizers of the NDC have bought and paid for that concocted story. And while that has engaged the Ghanaian, no one is looking as Tsatsu Tsikata cashes in – and boy is he cashing in.
Barely three weeks into the NDC administration, Tsikata flew to Houston with his wife to meet with Anadarko. Unconfirmed reports indicate that his accommodation at the luxury Sheraton Galleria, his medical bills – and we know he was ill when he first came out of prison on President Kufuor’s pardon – his wife’s shopping spree at a famous Houston Galleria Shopping Mall where according to our investigation is reserved for very rich people and celebrities. It is believe that her shopping was all paid for by Anadarko. It would not be the first time that a Business Partner’s trip is covered by a company for tax purposes, and for the purposes of avoiding the Feds’ investigation into an FCPA violation. the romance between the NDC, particularly Tsatsu Tsikata and Anadarko is as undeniable as it is cunning. **
what makes Mr. Tsikata’s trip to Houston immediately after the handover of power from NPP to NDC so suspicious is that:
1. He went to Houston to present himself as the energy czar for the new administration without necessarily having any official title 2. according to our reliable investigative sources, not unlike him, his trip was made rather nicodemously without the knowledge of the president and the energy minister except for his stooge at GNPC 3. without any official title he and his acquired spouse met with Anadarko executives under very questionable circumstances after which the momentum to the investigation of E.O Group and Kosmos picked up a new life
a little backtrack here. Due to Ghana’s quest to be friendly with reputable oil companies to help develop her oil prospects, GNPC promised Anadarko that a portion of Vanco’s large block would soon become available for bidding and that if Anadarko wanted a block where it would be able to operate, it could do worse than bid for that. Unfortunately, Norway’s Aker had already placed a bid on that block when Anadarko finally did. Aker eventually got the block over Anadarko. You can imagine Anadarko’s frustration then. Thus when the NDC came to power, Tsikata promised to deliver that block to Anadarko. any surprise, therefore, that the government has kicked Aker out?
Anadarko and Tsikata are the perfect match. Anadarko wants a block very badly, especially now that Ghana’s oil prospect is beyond doubt. It has consequently tried to bulldoze its way and gotten nowhere. Fortunately for the Houston based company, a willing partner emerged – one that has a grudge with anything NPP and Kufuor since, from his perspective, they both are responsible for his imprisonment. As the adage goes, the enemy of your enemy is your friend. There lies the reasons why although Tsikata is hell bent on cashing in on an oil find that proved elusive to him for over 15 years, he simply cannot relinquish the notion that there must have been something wrong with a deals signed under the Kufuor administration. our only hope is that this overpowering vindictiveness does not plunge our dear nation into the same chaos that has characterized many an oil find in Africa.
And for my friends at Anadarko, they will be well served to get an interpreter to explain to them the all fulfilling Akan adage which goes “The same cane that is used on Takyi will also be used on Baah”. the earlier they recognize that they are in bed with the devil the better it will be for them. Ghanaians have patience and tolerance but it would be risky for anyone to misconstrue such a noble quality as foolishness. Ghanaians are watching with tacit interest.
Anadarko's Romance with Tsikata Exposed
Related Blogs
Tags : innovative technology, kosmos
Date : March 10th, 2010Category : UncategorizedAuthor :
The modern paparazzi are not dependent on shady deals and lurking informers anymore. He knows what it takes to get that exclusive photo that can get the whole celebrity gossip world into a tizzy. the advantage of modern equipments are making it easier for him to go for that snap that can have all the celeb gossip magazines running after him. in the good old days, the money spent in procuring a photograph was sometimes more than what entertainment news papers and tabloids were willing to pay. All those days came to an end with the coming of age of the modern equipment. Now there’s a proper method to everything that happens.
The basic idea of paparazzi scoops is still the same. the race is still for that one photo that will have the celebrity in a position where it gets uncomfortable. Keeping this crux in place, the race is now to bring it to the celebrity gossip sites faster than any other. the paparazzi these days have a well-connected network that can inform the photographer about the whereabouts of a star in the shortest possible time. sometimes these informers are working for celeb gossip sites as well. when they spot a celeb off the usual route, in a restaurant dining with another hot star or at the salon getting a new hairdo, they tip off the entertainment news photographers.
The paparazzi now depend on modern equipment like digital and modern cameras. these become useful when the celebrities need to be photographed on private property. Celebrity gossip sites pay a handsome amount for exclusive photos of the wedding or engagement of the celebrities. the celebrities know that they are susceptible to attacks from the paparazzi. That makes them aware of their situation and they take proper precautions. They erect security guards and the police to keep the entertainment site photographers at bay. more often than not, these celebrities strike deals with the celeb gossip sites themselves to give them those photos of weddings, engagements and child birth. It’s like a business deal that is borne out of the need to protect privacy. when they know they can’t do much, the celebrities try to make money out of this situation.
The coming of the modern paparazzi means that there is no spot on this planet where the celebrity is not vulnerable to photographs. Celebrity gossip sites are waking up to the importance of allowing these photographs to come on their pages. They understand that a photograph on a celeb gossip site speaks a lot about credibility. People would believe a hazy photograph than lines of written evidence. This factor works wonders in the entertainment news world. People find it easier to believe a story if there is an accompanying photograph. the moralists may complain about the legal rights and privacy ethics, but the paparazzi are definitely here to stay!
The Modern Paparazzi | PIRATE SKY
Related Blogs
Tags : entertainment news, informers, photo, scoops
Date : March 10th, 2010Category : UncategorizedAuthor :
Simon Cowell confirms engagement on TV 
Tony Clark/WENN.com
Simon Cowell has confirmed his engagement – during an appearance on a late-night TV show.
The “American Idol” judge was being interviewed for “The Tonight show with Jay Leno” on Monday when the host decided to grill him about recent rumors regarding his make-up artist girlfriend, Mezhgan Hussainy.
Leno asked, “Are rumors you’re engaged true?” to which Cowell replied, “Are they true? well, I do have somebody in my life now, Jay, yes. and I kinda made a decision this year to make somebody happy.”
and when Leno enquired about the engagement band, Cowell replied, “It’s quite a big one, yes.”
Cowell later admitted he was blushing, before Leno proceeded to ask where the couple got engaged.
The music mogul replied, “I find this very uncomfortable. I was asleep, I think. No, look, I bought her the ring in London.”
Hussainy was later invited from the audience to join Cowell on-stage.
The Brit later joked that Leno could be the flower girl at the wedding ceremony, before talking about the prospect of children.
He quipped, “I’m kind of torn because I’m a bit too old to have kids, but then again I think it would be important to have a lot of ‘mes’ around in the future.”
Lindsay Lohan suing for $100 million over E-Trade ‘milkaholic’ baby ad; Bodyguards reveal Michael Jackson’s romances …
Related Blogs
Tags : brit, flower girl, girlfriend
Date : March 10th, 2010Category : UncategorizedAuthor :
 Mary McNamara / Los Angeles Times
Watching Sarah Jessica Parker widen her eyes and discuss the unsettling discovery that one of her ancestors was accused of witchcraft during the Salem witch trials, it’s difficult not to giggle and wonder where all this gravity was when she was prancing around with Bette Midler in “Hocus Pocus.”
But then that’s the risk when you base a television show on the genealogical searches of our “most beloved stars” — it’s no longer enough that we know the brand of stroller that Parker and husband Matthew Broderick (who will be featured later) use; now we need to dig deep into their family trees.
It’s a risk NBC is willing to take with “Who do You think You Are?”
Hosted by Lisa Kudrow, this is a U.S. version of the popular British series where celebrities dig up their family trees, though you do have to wonder if Parker was the best choice for last Friday’s premiere. yes, she has ancestors involved in two major American events — a relative left the family’s Cincinnati home for California as part of the Gold rush — but during the many clips of Parker walking down various streets looking pensive, thoughts about the cunning hats, the ridiculous heels, that now-signature runway walk continually distract.
And though Parker does her best to appear moved and humbled by the difficult and even tragic lives of her ancestors, the show is all about her, after all, forcing the uncomfortable question: If everything happens for a reason, did all this American drama occur to ensure the existence of “Sex and the City,” or even worse, “Did You Hear about the Morgans?”
It’s not fair to blame Parker, of course — who wouldn’t jump at the chance to have someone else organize and pay for an authoritative search into your genealogy? But as is so often the case with “reality television,” there’s nothing TV producers hate so much as actual reality (bo-ring!), and so everything is tarted up with superfluous soundtracks and staging, with breathless voice-overs, mood lighting and lots of half-baked psychology.
Brooke Shields joined the show to learn more about her mother’s mother, a woman she never liked. When it turns out that Shields’ grandmother lost her own mother at 10, the actress quickly surmises that the girl became mother to her younger siblings. and when it is revealed that one of those siblings drowned at 13, Shields instantly concludes that her grandmother felt guilty, experiencing the loss of not just a brother but also a son, all of which explains why Grandma was so mean to Mama Teri.
Well, OK, if that makes you feel better, but those are mighty big leaps. and did Shields really have to stand beside the Passaic River, gazing soulfully into the sunset? Surely the simple notations on the death certificate and the newspaper story describing the drowning were much more effective.
Of course, how you feel about each journey is predetermined by how you feel about the star — not surprisingly, my favorite segment of the four I saw was the one in which Susan Sarandon searches for her mysterious grandmother, Anita. (That she takes a trip to Tuscany along the way doesn’t hurt either.)
Other celebrities to be featured on the show include athlete Emmitt Smith and film director Spike Lee.
The power of “Who do You think You Are?” does not lie in the celebrity but in the much more dramatic nature of “ordinary” life. Residents of 21st century America cannot be reminded often enough of how easy so many of us have it compared with previous generations.
But viewers are not allowed a moment to contemplate such things or even to wonder about the often disturbing lack of familial communication before being whisked away to the next “Oh, my gosh” moment. That so many of these celebrities appear to know so little of their almost immediate heritage is astonishing, proof that nothing is more democratic than the past.
‘Who do You think You Are?’
'Who Do You Think You Are?' traces celebs' ancestry
Tags : family trees, los angeles times, stroller
Date : March 10th, 2010Category : UncategorizedAuthor :
![]()
There is something incredibly unseemly about an emergency room patient — in the final throes of life — being photographed by ER staff and others as he is dying on an operating table.
But then, kite surfer Stephen Schafer was a different kind of patient, even by ER standards: He’d been the victim of a shark attack in the Atlantic Ocean off Stuart and would soon become the focus of national and international media attention.
So, to preserve the moment and share the event with others — aren’t these two reasons why people take photographs? — an undisclosed number of personnel pulled out their cell-phone cameras and clicked away.
This outrageous scenario unfolded Feb. 3 in the Martin Memorial Medical Center Emergency Department.
To date, the hospital’s response to this violation of patient privacy laws and breach of professional ethics has been woefully inadequate.
Oh, hospital administrators immediately launched an investigation. three weeks later (Feb. 26), they released a statement and announced the results.
Cell phones “were used to take photographs of Mr. Schafer’s injuries by individuals who were in the emergency room at that time,” the statement said. Those who took photographs have been asked to “destroy or eliminate any remaining photos” out of respect for the Schafer family.
Additionally, the hospital has “disciplined a number of individuals commensurate with the extent of their actions.” Penalties range from “written warning, suspension and demotion to loss of position.”
Martin Memorial officials have said, in so many words, it won’t happen again. unfortunately, by failing to provide more detailed information, the public is left wondering: 1) Was this really a thorough investigation? And 2) does Martin Memorial truly appreciate the seriousness of this issue from the public’s perspective?
There are several questions hospital officials need to answer, including:
• How many individuals were involved in the photo-taking? “A number of individuals” could be four or 14. a specific number would clarify the extent — or limitation — of the ethics breach.
• How extensively were the photos distributed?
• Have photo-takers provided investigators with names of individuals to whom the pictures were distributed?
• what steps — beyond asking photo-takers to destroy the pictures — is the hospital taking to ensure the photos don’t appear in print or on the Internet?
• were any ER or hospital supervisors involved?
• what safeguards will be implemented to ensure something like this doesn’t happen again?
• does or should the hospital have a zero tolerance policy on personal photo taking? Or, would it be worthwhile for an employee to get a few days off in exchange for taking a picture of a celebrity that can be sold to the highest-bidding gossip publication?
• How can members of the public be assured embarrassing pictures won’t be taken for ogling?
In addition to providing more information, Martin Memorial should heed the suggestion of medical ethicist Jonathan Moreno, professor of philosophy and medical ethics at the University of Pennsylvania, and hire an independent, outside consultant to evaluate emergency room policies and procedures, and report his findings to the public.
Martin Memorial’s credibility is at stake here.
Editorial: Public needs, deserves more information from Martin Memorial on ER photo probe
Related Blogs
Tags : emergency department, kite surfer
Date : March 10th, 2010Category : UncategorizedAuthor :
Sandra Talks to Oprah as her Husband Gushes about her Win Mar 9th, 2010 – PopSugar
The big winners at Sunday’s Oscars had their schedules full between the Governor’s Ball, Elton John’s AIDS fundraiser, and the Vanity fair afterparty, and things haven’t slowed down yet.
'The Blind Side' Star Quinton Aaron Admits Onetime Crush On Sandra …
Related Blogs
Tags : afterparty, aids, quinton
|
|
